The only known external usage of it was in prometheus/pushgateway,
where it was removed by
https://github.com/prometheus/pushgateway/pull/200 .
Originally, the expectation was that users would implement the Metric
interface now and then. As we know now, neither it is happening, nor
would it make a lot of sense. (Users implement the Collector interface
instead.) By now, LabelPairSorter is essentially noise in the already
quite cluttered namespace in the prometheus package.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@soundcloud.com>
This is for types we don't want to export but which are used in
different packages within client_golang.
Currently, that's only NormalizeMetricFamilies (used in the prometheus
package and in the testutil package). More to be added as needed.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@soundcloud.com>
- Expected text format is now read from an io.Reader.
- Metrics are gathered from a Gatherer.
- Added a convenience wrapper to collect from a Collector.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@soundcloud.com>
`testutil` is more in line with stdlib naming conventions.
The package should be below `prometheus` as it only provides utils to
test exposition code, not to test HTTP client code.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@soundcloud.com>
So far, if a gauge was named `xxx_count`, and a summary or histogram
`xxx`, this would have led to a legal protobuf exposition but would
have created a name collision on `xxx_count` in the text format and
within the Prometheus server.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@soundcloud.com>
Also, clarify in the doc comment.
Previously, the assumption was that inconsistent label dimensions are
violating the exposition format spec. However, especially with the
knowledge that OpenMetrics will explicitly allow inconsistent label
dimensions in expositions, we should allow it in client_golang, too.
Note that registration with proper Descs provided will still check for
consistont label dimensions. However, you can "cheat" with custom
Collectors as you can collect metrics that don't follew the provided
Desc (this will be made more explicit and less cheaty once #47 is
fixed). You can also create expositions with inconsistent label
dimensions by merging Gatherers with the Gatherers slice type. (The
latter is used in the Pushgateway.)
Effectively, normal direct instrumentation will always have consistent
label dimensions in this way, but you can cover special use cases with
custom collectors or merging of different Gatherers.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@soundcloud.com>
While not strictly correct, it can easily happen that proto messages
are created that use nil pointers instead of pointers in empty strings
to denote an empty string.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@soundcloud.com>
Fixes:
http.go:118: declaration of "part" shadows declaration at http.go:117
http_test.go:50: declaration of "respBody" shadows declaration at http_test.go:25
promhttp/http.go:305: declaration of "part" shadows declaration at promhttp/http.go:304
Signed-off-by: Karsten Weiss <knweiss@gmail.com>
The test case requires the /proc filesystem. The change prevents this skip
message during "go test -v" on platforms other than Linux:
=== RUN TestProcessCollector
--- SKIP: TestProcessCollector (0.00s)
process_collector_test.go:15: skipping TestProcessCollector, procfs not available: could not read /proc: stat /proc: no such file or directory
Signed-off-by: Karsten Weiss <knweiss@gmail.com>
Fixes:
prometheus/http_test.go:117:5⚠️ should use resp.Body.String() instead of string(resp.Body.Bytes()) (S1030) (megacheck)
prometheus/http_test.go:118:56⚠️ should use resp.Body.String() instead of string(resp.Body.Bytes()) (S1030) (megacheck)
Signed-off-by: Karsten Weiss <knweiss@gmail.com>
Finally, I found an easy solution to provide the "evil"
auto-registration without getting death threats from the wardens of Go
purity. The reasoning can be found in the package's doc comment.
In principle, we needed to iterate through all permutations, mirroring
the same that is happening in the code. For lack of time, I only
picked one of the cases currently buggy.
As said, this really needs code generation, should we ever find
ourselves touching this again.
Previously, the pickDelegator function was not returning a
*hijackerDelegator so the return value did not implement the Hijacker
interface. As a result, code that attempts to hijack the connection
would fail when using a type assertion.
All the other cases returned the hijackerDelegator correctly.
Original discussion see
https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/pull/362 .
Assuming that the most frequently used method of a `Gauge` is `Set`
and the most frequently used method of a `Conuter` is `Inc`, this
separates the implementation of both metric types. `Inc` and integral
`Add` of a counter is now handled in a separate `uint64`. This would
create a race in `Set`, but luckily, there is no `Set` anymore in a
counter.
All attempts to solve above race (to use the same idea for a `Gauge`)
slow down `Set`, So we just stick with the old implementation
(formerly `value`) for `Gauge`.
The idea behind it is described in detail in
https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/320 .
This commit also updates the example given in
promhttp/instrument_server_test.go , which nicely illustrates the
benefit of this change.
So far, currying could be emulated by creating different metric vec's
with different values in their ConstLabels. This was quite difficult
to grasp - which is essentially what was done in the example mentioned
above. Now that this use case can be solved without ConstLabels, we
can safely declare ConstLabels as rarely used. (Perhaps we can
deprecate them entirely one day, but I'll take a raincheck on that
when the changes of v0.10 have materialized.) This commit thus also
updates the ConstLabel doc comments in the various Opts. (It contained
fairly outdated stuff anyway.)
The "panic in case of error" code was so far in metricVec. This pulls
it up into the exported types like CounterVec. This is code
replication, but it avoids an explicit type conversion. Mostly,
however, this is preparation to make the wrapped metricVec an
interface (required for curried vec's).
Specifically @beorn7 pointed out that the previous implementation had
some shortcomings around large numbers. I've changed the code to match
the suggestion in review, as well as added a few test cases.
MetricVec is un-experted by now. godoc handles that correctly by
showing the methods of the embedded un-exported metricVec with the
exported type (CounterVec, SummaryVec, ...) that embeds metricVec.
This is in preparation for "curried" metric vecs, as discussed.
And it's a good thing anyway. The exported MetricVec was from a time
when I thought people would define own Metric types and then create
Vecs of it. That has never happened.
beorn7