Attempt to fix flakiness of TestGoCollectorMemStats

This is really lame as it essentially just uses longer times to
wait. The test is still timing-dependent and thus could still
theoretically fail with unlucky scheduling. However, we are testing
something that _is_ about timing. Turning this all into something not
timing-dependent would be first quite involved and second might defeat
the purpose of testing code that is inherently about timing.

Let's see how this works out in practice.

Signed-off-by: beorn7 <bjoern@rabenste.in>
This commit is contained in:
beorn7 2019-05-26 13:25:59 +02:00
parent b46e6ec51b
commit fe90eea9bb
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -184,14 +184,14 @@ func TestGoCollectorMemStats(t *testing.T) {
}
}
// Speed up the timing to make the tast faster.
c.msMaxWait = time.Millisecond
c.msMaxAge = 10 * time.Millisecond
// Speed up the timing to make the test faster.
c.msMaxWait = 5 * time.Millisecond
c.msMaxAge = 50 * time.Millisecond
// Scenario 1: msRead responds slowly, no previous memstats available,
// msRead is executed anyway.
c.msRead = func(ms *runtime.MemStats) {
time.Sleep(3 * time.Millisecond)
time.Sleep(20 * time.Millisecond)
ms.Alloc = 1
}
checkCollect(1)
@ -218,12 +218,12 @@ func TestGoCollectorMemStats(t *testing.T) {
// Scenario 3: msRead responds slowly, previous memstats available, old
// value collected.
c.msRead = func(ms *runtime.MemStats) {
time.Sleep(3 * time.Millisecond)
time.Sleep(20 * time.Millisecond)
ms.Alloc = 3
}
checkCollect(2)
// After waiting, new value is still set in msLast.
time.Sleep(12 * time.Millisecond)
time.Sleep(80 * time.Millisecond)
c.msMtx.Lock()
if want, got := uint64(3), c.msLast.Alloc; want != got {
t.Errorf("unexpected of msLast.Alloc, want %d, got %d", want, got)
@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ func TestGoCollectorMemStats(t *testing.T) {
// Scenario 4: msRead responds slowly, previous memstats is too old, new
// value collected.
c.msRead = func(ms *runtime.MemStats) {
time.Sleep(3 * time.Millisecond)
time.Sleep(20 * time.Millisecond)
ms.Alloc = 4
}
checkCollect(4)