client_golang/prometheus/examples_test.go

755 lines
23 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2014 The Prometheus Authors
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package prometheus_test
import (
"bytes"
"fmt"
"math"
"net/http"
"runtime"
"sort"
"strings"
2015-02-27 18:12:59 +03:00
dto "github.com/prometheus/client_model/go"
"github.com/prometheus/common/expfmt"
2015-02-27 18:12:59 +03:00
"github.com/golang/protobuf/proto"
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus"
)
func ExampleGauge() {
opsQueued := prometheus.NewGauge(prometheus.GaugeOpts{
Namespace: "our_company",
Subsystem: "blob_storage",
Name: "ops_queued",
Help: "Number of blob storage operations waiting to be processed.",
})
prometheus.MustRegister(opsQueued)
// 10 operations queued by the goroutine managing incoming requests.
opsQueued.Add(10)
// A worker goroutine has picked up a waiting operation.
opsQueued.Dec()
// And once more...
opsQueued.Dec()
}
func ExampleGaugeVec() {
opsQueued := prometheus.NewGaugeVec(
prometheus.GaugeOpts{
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
Namespace: "our_company",
Subsystem: "blob_storage",
Name: "ops_queued",
Help: "Number of blob storage operations waiting to be processed, partitioned by user and type.",
},
[]string{
// Which user has requested the operation?
"user",
// Of what type is the operation?
"type",
},
)
prometheus.MustRegister(opsQueued)
// Increase a value using compact (but order-sensitive!) WithLabelValues().
opsQueued.WithLabelValues("bob", "put").Add(4)
// Increase a value with a map using WithLabels. More verbose, but order
// doesn't matter anymore.
opsQueued.With(prometheus.Labels{"type": "delete", "user": "alice"}).Inc()
}
func ExampleGaugeFunc() {
Allow error reporting during metrics collection and simplify Register(). Both are interface changes I want to get in before public announcement. They only break rare usage cases, and are always easy to fix, but still we want to avoid breaking changes after a wider announcement of the project. The change of Register() simply removes the return of the Collector, which nobody was using in practice. It was just bloating the call syntax. Note that this is different from RegisterOrGet(), which is used at various occasions where you want to register something that might or might not be registered already, but if it is, you want the previously registered Collector back (because that's the relevant one). WRT error reporting: I first tried the obvious way of letting the Collector methods Describe() and Collect() return error. However, I had to conclude that that bloated _many_ calls and their handling in very obnoxious ways. On the other hand, the case where you actually want to report errors during registration or collection is very rare. Hence, this approach has the wrong trade-off. The approach taken here might at first appear clunky but is in practice quite handy, mostly because there is almost no change for the "normal" case of "no special error handling", but also because it plays well with the way descriptors and metrics are handled (via channels). Explaining the approach in more detail: - During registration / describe: Error handling was actually already in place (for invalid descriptors, which carry an error anyway). I only added a convenience function to create an invalid descriptor with a given error on purpose. - Metrics are now treated in a similar way. The Write method returns an error now (the only change in interface). An "invalid metric" is provided that can be sent via the channel to signal that that metric could not be collected. It alse transports an error. NON-GOALS OF THIS COMMIT: This is NOT yet the major improvement of the whole registry part, where we want a public Registry interface and plenty of modular configurations (for error handling, various auto-metrics, http instrumentation, testing, ...). However, we can do that whole thing without breaking existing interfaces. For now (which is a significant issue) any error during collection will either cause a 500 HTTP response or a panic (depending on registry config). Later, we definitely want to have a possibility to skip (and only report somehow) non-collectible metrics instead of aborting the whole scrape.
2015-01-12 21:16:09 +03:00
if err := prometheus.Register(prometheus.NewGaugeFunc(
prometheus.GaugeOpts{
Subsystem: "runtime",
Name: "goroutines_count",
Help: "Number of goroutines that currently exist.",
},
func() float64 { return float64(runtime.NumGoroutine()) },
)); err == nil {
fmt.Println("GaugeFunc 'goroutines_count' registered.")
}
// Note that the count of goroutines is a gauge (and not a counter) as
// it can go up and down.
// Output:
// GaugeFunc 'goroutines_count' registered.
}
func ExampleCounter() {
pushCounter := prometheus.NewCounter(prometheus.CounterOpts{
Name: "repository_pushes", // Note: No help string...
})
Allow error reporting during metrics collection and simplify Register(). Both are interface changes I want to get in before public announcement. They only break rare usage cases, and are always easy to fix, but still we want to avoid breaking changes after a wider announcement of the project. The change of Register() simply removes the return of the Collector, which nobody was using in practice. It was just bloating the call syntax. Note that this is different from RegisterOrGet(), which is used at various occasions where you want to register something that might or might not be registered already, but if it is, you want the previously registered Collector back (because that's the relevant one). WRT error reporting: I first tried the obvious way of letting the Collector methods Describe() and Collect() return error. However, I had to conclude that that bloated _many_ calls and their handling in very obnoxious ways. On the other hand, the case where you actually want to report errors during registration or collection is very rare. Hence, this approach has the wrong trade-off. The approach taken here might at first appear clunky but is in practice quite handy, mostly because there is almost no change for the "normal" case of "no special error handling", but also because it plays well with the way descriptors and metrics are handled (via channels). Explaining the approach in more detail: - During registration / describe: Error handling was actually already in place (for invalid descriptors, which carry an error anyway). I only added a convenience function to create an invalid descriptor with a given error on purpose. - Metrics are now treated in a similar way. The Write method returns an error now (the only change in interface). An "invalid metric" is provided that can be sent via the channel to signal that that metric could not be collected. It alse transports an error. NON-GOALS OF THIS COMMIT: This is NOT yet the major improvement of the whole registry part, where we want a public Registry interface and plenty of modular configurations (for error handling, various auto-metrics, http instrumentation, testing, ...). However, we can do that whole thing without breaking existing interfaces. For now (which is a significant issue) any error during collection will either cause a 500 HTTP response or a panic (depending on registry config). Later, we definitely want to have a possibility to skip (and only report somehow) non-collectible metrics instead of aborting the whole scrape.
2015-01-12 21:16:09 +03:00
err := prometheus.Register(pushCounter) // ... so this will return an error.
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Push counter couldn't be registered, no counting will happen:", err)
return
}
// Try it once more, this time with a help string.
pushCounter = prometheus.NewCounter(prometheus.CounterOpts{
Name: "repository_pushes",
Help: "Number of pushes to external repository.",
})
Allow error reporting during metrics collection and simplify Register(). Both are interface changes I want to get in before public announcement. They only break rare usage cases, and are always easy to fix, but still we want to avoid breaking changes after a wider announcement of the project. The change of Register() simply removes the return of the Collector, which nobody was using in practice. It was just bloating the call syntax. Note that this is different from RegisterOrGet(), which is used at various occasions where you want to register something that might or might not be registered already, but if it is, you want the previously registered Collector back (because that's the relevant one). WRT error reporting: I first tried the obvious way of letting the Collector methods Describe() and Collect() return error. However, I had to conclude that that bloated _many_ calls and their handling in very obnoxious ways. On the other hand, the case where you actually want to report errors during registration or collection is very rare. Hence, this approach has the wrong trade-off. The approach taken here might at first appear clunky but is in practice quite handy, mostly because there is almost no change for the "normal" case of "no special error handling", but also because it plays well with the way descriptors and metrics are handled (via channels). Explaining the approach in more detail: - During registration / describe: Error handling was actually already in place (for invalid descriptors, which carry an error anyway). I only added a convenience function to create an invalid descriptor with a given error on purpose. - Metrics are now treated in a similar way. The Write method returns an error now (the only change in interface). An "invalid metric" is provided that can be sent via the channel to signal that that metric could not be collected. It alse transports an error. NON-GOALS OF THIS COMMIT: This is NOT yet the major improvement of the whole registry part, where we want a public Registry interface and plenty of modular configurations (for error handling, various auto-metrics, http instrumentation, testing, ...). However, we can do that whole thing without breaking existing interfaces. For now (which is a significant issue) any error during collection will either cause a 500 HTTP response or a panic (depending on registry config). Later, we definitely want to have a possibility to skip (and only report somehow) non-collectible metrics instead of aborting the whole scrape.
2015-01-12 21:16:09 +03:00
err = prometheus.Register(pushCounter)
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Push counter couldn't be registered AGAIN, no counting will happen:", err)
return
}
pushComplete := make(chan struct{})
// TODO: Start a goroutine that performs repository pushes and reports
// each completion via the channel.
for range pushComplete {
pushCounter.Inc()
}
// Output:
// Push counter couldn't be registered, no counting will happen: descriptor Desc{fqName: "repository_pushes", help: "", constLabels: {}, variableLabels: []} is invalid: empty help string
}
func ExampleCounterVec() {
httpReqs := prometheus.NewCounterVec(
prometheus.CounterOpts{
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
Name: "http_requests_total",
Help: "How many HTTP requests processed, partitioned by status code and HTTP method.",
},
[]string{"code", "method"},
)
prometheus.MustRegister(httpReqs)
httpReqs.WithLabelValues("404", "POST").Add(42)
// If you have to access the same set of labels very frequently, it
// might be good to retrieve the metric only once and keep a handle to
// it. But beware of deletion of that metric, see below!
m := httpReqs.WithLabelValues("200", "GET")
for i := 0; i < 1000000; i++ {
m.Inc()
}
// Delete a metric from the vector. If you have previously kept a handle
// to that metric (as above), future updates via that handle will go
// unseen (even if you re-create a metric with the same label set
// later).
httpReqs.DeleteLabelValues("200", "GET")
// Same thing with the more verbose Labels syntax.
httpReqs.Delete(prometheus.Labels{"method": "GET", "code": "200"})
}
func ExampleInstrumentHandler() {
// Handle the "/doc" endpoint with the standard http.FileServer handler.
// By wrapping the handler with InstrumentHandler, request count,
// request and response sizes, and request latency are automatically
// exported to Prometheus, partitioned by HTTP status code and method
// and by the handler name (here "fileserver").
http.Handle("/doc", prometheus.InstrumentHandler(
"fileserver", http.FileServer(http.Dir("/usr/share/doc")),
))
// The Prometheus handler still has to be registered to handle the
// "/metrics" endpoint. The handler returned by prometheus.Handler() is
// already instrumented - with "prometheus" as the handler name. In this
// example, we want the handler name to be "metrics", so we instrument
// the uninstrumented Prometheus handler ourselves.
http.Handle("/metrics", prometheus.InstrumentHandler(
"metrics", prometheus.UninstrumentedHandler(),
))
}
func ExampleLabelPairSorter() {
labelPairs := []*dto.LabelPair{
{Name: proto.String("status"), Value: proto.String("404")},
{Name: proto.String("method"), Value: proto.String("get")},
}
sort.Sort(prometheus.LabelPairSorter(labelPairs))
fmt.Println(labelPairs)
// Output:
// [name:"method" value:"get" name:"status" value:"404" ]
}
func ExampleRegister() {
// Imagine you have a worker pool and want to count the tasks completed.
taskCounter := prometheus.NewCounter(prometheus.CounterOpts{
Subsystem: "worker_pool",
Name: "completed_tasks_total",
Help: "Total number of tasks completed.",
})
// This will register fine.
Allow error reporting during metrics collection and simplify Register(). Both are interface changes I want to get in before public announcement. They only break rare usage cases, and are always easy to fix, but still we want to avoid breaking changes after a wider announcement of the project. The change of Register() simply removes the return of the Collector, which nobody was using in practice. It was just bloating the call syntax. Note that this is different from RegisterOrGet(), which is used at various occasions where you want to register something that might or might not be registered already, but if it is, you want the previously registered Collector back (because that's the relevant one). WRT error reporting: I first tried the obvious way of letting the Collector methods Describe() and Collect() return error. However, I had to conclude that that bloated _many_ calls and their handling in very obnoxious ways. On the other hand, the case where you actually want to report errors during registration or collection is very rare. Hence, this approach has the wrong trade-off. The approach taken here might at first appear clunky but is in practice quite handy, mostly because there is almost no change for the "normal" case of "no special error handling", but also because it plays well with the way descriptors and metrics are handled (via channels). Explaining the approach in more detail: - During registration / describe: Error handling was actually already in place (for invalid descriptors, which carry an error anyway). I only added a convenience function to create an invalid descriptor with a given error on purpose. - Metrics are now treated in a similar way. The Write method returns an error now (the only change in interface). An "invalid metric" is provided that can be sent via the channel to signal that that metric could not be collected. It alse transports an error. NON-GOALS OF THIS COMMIT: This is NOT yet the major improvement of the whole registry part, where we want a public Registry interface and plenty of modular configurations (for error handling, various auto-metrics, http instrumentation, testing, ...). However, we can do that whole thing without breaking existing interfaces. For now (which is a significant issue) any error during collection will either cause a 500 HTTP response or a panic (depending on registry config). Later, we definitely want to have a possibility to skip (and only report somehow) non-collectible metrics instead of aborting the whole scrape.
2015-01-12 21:16:09 +03:00
if err := prometheus.Register(taskCounter); err != nil {
fmt.Println(err)
} else {
fmt.Println("taskCounter registered.")
}
// Don't forget to tell the HTTP server about the Prometheus handler.
// (In a real program, you still need to start the HTTP server...)
http.Handle("/metrics", prometheus.Handler())
// Now you can start workers and give every one of them a pointer to
// taskCounter and let it increment it whenever it completes a task.
taskCounter.Inc() // This has to happen somewhere in the worker code.
// But wait, you want to see how individual workers perform. So you need
// a vector of counters, with one element for each worker.
taskCounterVec := prometheus.NewCounterVec(
prometheus.CounterOpts{
Subsystem: "worker_pool",
Name: "completed_tasks_total",
Help: "Total number of tasks completed.",
},
[]string{"worker_id"},
)
// Registering will fail because we already have a metric of that name.
Allow error reporting during metrics collection and simplify Register(). Both are interface changes I want to get in before public announcement. They only break rare usage cases, and are always easy to fix, but still we want to avoid breaking changes after a wider announcement of the project. The change of Register() simply removes the return of the Collector, which nobody was using in practice. It was just bloating the call syntax. Note that this is different from RegisterOrGet(), which is used at various occasions where you want to register something that might or might not be registered already, but if it is, you want the previously registered Collector back (because that's the relevant one). WRT error reporting: I first tried the obvious way of letting the Collector methods Describe() and Collect() return error. However, I had to conclude that that bloated _many_ calls and their handling in very obnoxious ways. On the other hand, the case where you actually want to report errors during registration or collection is very rare. Hence, this approach has the wrong trade-off. The approach taken here might at first appear clunky but is in practice quite handy, mostly because there is almost no change for the "normal" case of "no special error handling", but also because it plays well with the way descriptors and metrics are handled (via channels). Explaining the approach in more detail: - During registration / describe: Error handling was actually already in place (for invalid descriptors, which carry an error anyway). I only added a convenience function to create an invalid descriptor with a given error on purpose. - Metrics are now treated in a similar way. The Write method returns an error now (the only change in interface). An "invalid metric" is provided that can be sent via the channel to signal that that metric could not be collected. It alse transports an error. NON-GOALS OF THIS COMMIT: This is NOT yet the major improvement of the whole registry part, where we want a public Registry interface and plenty of modular configurations (for error handling, various auto-metrics, http instrumentation, testing, ...). However, we can do that whole thing without breaking existing interfaces. For now (which is a significant issue) any error during collection will either cause a 500 HTTP response or a panic (depending on registry config). Later, we definitely want to have a possibility to skip (and only report somehow) non-collectible metrics instead of aborting the whole scrape.
2015-01-12 21:16:09 +03:00
if err := prometheus.Register(taskCounterVec); err != nil {
fmt.Println("taskCounterVec not registered:", err)
} else {
fmt.Println("taskCounterVec registered.")
}
// To fix, first unregister the old taskCounter.
if prometheus.Unregister(taskCounter) {
fmt.Println("taskCounter unregistered.")
}
// Try registering taskCounterVec again.
Allow error reporting during metrics collection and simplify Register(). Both are interface changes I want to get in before public announcement. They only break rare usage cases, and are always easy to fix, but still we want to avoid breaking changes after a wider announcement of the project. The change of Register() simply removes the return of the Collector, which nobody was using in practice. It was just bloating the call syntax. Note that this is different from RegisterOrGet(), which is used at various occasions where you want to register something that might or might not be registered already, but if it is, you want the previously registered Collector back (because that's the relevant one). WRT error reporting: I first tried the obvious way of letting the Collector methods Describe() and Collect() return error. However, I had to conclude that that bloated _many_ calls and their handling in very obnoxious ways. On the other hand, the case where you actually want to report errors during registration or collection is very rare. Hence, this approach has the wrong trade-off. The approach taken here might at first appear clunky but is in practice quite handy, mostly because there is almost no change for the "normal" case of "no special error handling", but also because it plays well with the way descriptors and metrics are handled (via channels). Explaining the approach in more detail: - During registration / describe: Error handling was actually already in place (for invalid descriptors, which carry an error anyway). I only added a convenience function to create an invalid descriptor with a given error on purpose. - Metrics are now treated in a similar way. The Write method returns an error now (the only change in interface). An "invalid metric" is provided that can be sent via the channel to signal that that metric could not be collected. It alse transports an error. NON-GOALS OF THIS COMMIT: This is NOT yet the major improvement of the whole registry part, where we want a public Registry interface and plenty of modular configurations (for error handling, various auto-metrics, http instrumentation, testing, ...). However, we can do that whole thing without breaking existing interfaces. For now (which is a significant issue) any error during collection will either cause a 500 HTTP response or a panic (depending on registry config). Later, we definitely want to have a possibility to skip (and only report somehow) non-collectible metrics instead of aborting the whole scrape.
2015-01-12 21:16:09 +03:00
if err := prometheus.Register(taskCounterVec); err != nil {
fmt.Println("taskCounterVec not registered:", err)
} else {
fmt.Println("taskCounterVec registered.")
}
// Bummer! Still doesn't work.
// Prometheus will not allow you to ever export metrics with
// inconsistent help strings or label names. After unregistering, the
// unregistered metrics will cease to show up in the /metrics HTTP
// response, but the registry still remembers that those metrics had
// been exported before. For this example, we will now choose a
// different name. (In a real program, you would obviously not export
// the obsolete metric in the first place.)
taskCounterVec = prometheus.NewCounterVec(
prometheus.CounterOpts{
Subsystem: "worker_pool",
Name: "completed_tasks_by_id",
Help: "Total number of tasks completed.",
},
[]string{"worker_id"},
)
Allow error reporting during metrics collection and simplify Register(). Both are interface changes I want to get in before public announcement. They only break rare usage cases, and are always easy to fix, but still we want to avoid breaking changes after a wider announcement of the project. The change of Register() simply removes the return of the Collector, which nobody was using in practice. It was just bloating the call syntax. Note that this is different from RegisterOrGet(), which is used at various occasions where you want to register something that might or might not be registered already, but if it is, you want the previously registered Collector back (because that's the relevant one). WRT error reporting: I first tried the obvious way of letting the Collector methods Describe() and Collect() return error. However, I had to conclude that that bloated _many_ calls and their handling in very obnoxious ways. On the other hand, the case where you actually want to report errors during registration or collection is very rare. Hence, this approach has the wrong trade-off. The approach taken here might at first appear clunky but is in practice quite handy, mostly because there is almost no change for the "normal" case of "no special error handling", but also because it plays well with the way descriptors and metrics are handled (via channels). Explaining the approach in more detail: - During registration / describe: Error handling was actually already in place (for invalid descriptors, which carry an error anyway). I only added a convenience function to create an invalid descriptor with a given error on purpose. - Metrics are now treated in a similar way. The Write method returns an error now (the only change in interface). An "invalid metric" is provided that can be sent via the channel to signal that that metric could not be collected. It alse transports an error. NON-GOALS OF THIS COMMIT: This is NOT yet the major improvement of the whole registry part, where we want a public Registry interface and plenty of modular configurations (for error handling, various auto-metrics, http instrumentation, testing, ...). However, we can do that whole thing without breaking existing interfaces. For now (which is a significant issue) any error during collection will either cause a 500 HTTP response or a panic (depending on registry config). Later, we definitely want to have a possibility to skip (and only report somehow) non-collectible metrics instead of aborting the whole scrape.
2015-01-12 21:16:09 +03:00
if err := prometheus.Register(taskCounterVec); err != nil {
fmt.Println("taskCounterVec not registered:", err)
} else {
fmt.Println("taskCounterVec registered.")
}
// Finally it worked!
// The workers have to tell taskCounterVec their id to increment the
// right element in the metric vector.
taskCounterVec.WithLabelValues("42").Inc() // Code from worker 42.
// Each worker could also keep a reference to their own counter element
// around. Pick the counter at initialization time of the worker.
myCounter := taskCounterVec.WithLabelValues("42") // From worker 42 initialization code.
myCounter.Inc() // Somewhere in the code of that worker.
// Note that something like WithLabelValues("42", "spurious arg") would
// panic (because you have provided too many label values). If you want
// to get an error instead, use GetMetricWithLabelValues(...) instead.
notMyCounter, err := taskCounterVec.GetMetricWithLabelValues("42", "spurious arg")
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Worker initialization failed:", err)
}
if notMyCounter == nil {
fmt.Println("notMyCounter is nil.")
}
// A different (and somewhat tricky) approach is to use
// ConstLabels. ConstLabels are pairs of label names and label values
// that never change. You might ask what those labels are good for (and
// rightfully so - if they never change, they could as well be part of
// the metric name). There are essentially two use-cases: The first is
// if labels are constant throughout the lifetime of a binary execution,
// but they vary over time or between different instances of a running
// binary. The second is what we have here: Each worker creates and
// registers an own Counter instance where the only difference is in the
// value of the ConstLabels. Those Counters can all be registered
// because the different ConstLabel values guarantee that each worker
// will increment a different Counter metric.
counterOpts := prometheus.CounterOpts{
Subsystem: "worker_pool",
Name: "completed_tasks",
Help: "Total number of tasks completed.",
ConstLabels: prometheus.Labels{"worker_id": "42"},
}
taskCounterForWorker42 := prometheus.NewCounter(counterOpts)
Allow error reporting during metrics collection and simplify Register(). Both are interface changes I want to get in before public announcement. They only break rare usage cases, and are always easy to fix, but still we want to avoid breaking changes after a wider announcement of the project. The change of Register() simply removes the return of the Collector, which nobody was using in practice. It was just bloating the call syntax. Note that this is different from RegisterOrGet(), which is used at various occasions where you want to register something that might or might not be registered already, but if it is, you want the previously registered Collector back (because that's the relevant one). WRT error reporting: I first tried the obvious way of letting the Collector methods Describe() and Collect() return error. However, I had to conclude that that bloated _many_ calls and their handling in very obnoxious ways. On the other hand, the case where you actually want to report errors during registration or collection is very rare. Hence, this approach has the wrong trade-off. The approach taken here might at first appear clunky but is in practice quite handy, mostly because there is almost no change for the "normal" case of "no special error handling", but also because it plays well with the way descriptors and metrics are handled (via channels). Explaining the approach in more detail: - During registration / describe: Error handling was actually already in place (for invalid descriptors, which carry an error anyway). I only added a convenience function to create an invalid descriptor with a given error on purpose. - Metrics are now treated in a similar way. The Write method returns an error now (the only change in interface). An "invalid metric" is provided that can be sent via the channel to signal that that metric could not be collected. It alse transports an error. NON-GOALS OF THIS COMMIT: This is NOT yet the major improvement of the whole registry part, where we want a public Registry interface and plenty of modular configurations (for error handling, various auto-metrics, http instrumentation, testing, ...). However, we can do that whole thing without breaking existing interfaces. For now (which is a significant issue) any error during collection will either cause a 500 HTTP response or a panic (depending on registry config). Later, we definitely want to have a possibility to skip (and only report somehow) non-collectible metrics instead of aborting the whole scrape.
2015-01-12 21:16:09 +03:00
if err := prometheus.Register(taskCounterForWorker42); err != nil {
fmt.Println("taskCounterVForWorker42 not registered:", err)
} else {
fmt.Println("taskCounterForWorker42 registered.")
}
// Obviously, in real code, taskCounterForWorker42 would be a member
// variable of a worker struct, and the "42" would be retrieved with a
// GetId() method or something. The Counter would be created and
// registered in the initialization code of the worker.
// For the creation of the next Counter, we can recycle
// counterOpts. Just change the ConstLabels.
counterOpts.ConstLabels = prometheus.Labels{"worker_id": "2001"}
taskCounterForWorker2001 := prometheus.NewCounter(counterOpts)
Allow error reporting during metrics collection and simplify Register(). Both are interface changes I want to get in before public announcement. They only break rare usage cases, and are always easy to fix, but still we want to avoid breaking changes after a wider announcement of the project. The change of Register() simply removes the return of the Collector, which nobody was using in practice. It was just bloating the call syntax. Note that this is different from RegisterOrGet(), which is used at various occasions where you want to register something that might or might not be registered already, but if it is, you want the previously registered Collector back (because that's the relevant one). WRT error reporting: I first tried the obvious way of letting the Collector methods Describe() and Collect() return error. However, I had to conclude that that bloated _many_ calls and their handling in very obnoxious ways. On the other hand, the case where you actually want to report errors during registration or collection is very rare. Hence, this approach has the wrong trade-off. The approach taken here might at first appear clunky but is in practice quite handy, mostly because there is almost no change for the "normal" case of "no special error handling", but also because it plays well with the way descriptors and metrics are handled (via channels). Explaining the approach in more detail: - During registration / describe: Error handling was actually already in place (for invalid descriptors, which carry an error anyway). I only added a convenience function to create an invalid descriptor with a given error on purpose. - Metrics are now treated in a similar way. The Write method returns an error now (the only change in interface). An "invalid metric" is provided that can be sent via the channel to signal that that metric could not be collected. It alse transports an error. NON-GOALS OF THIS COMMIT: This is NOT yet the major improvement of the whole registry part, where we want a public Registry interface and plenty of modular configurations (for error handling, various auto-metrics, http instrumentation, testing, ...). However, we can do that whole thing without breaking existing interfaces. For now (which is a significant issue) any error during collection will either cause a 500 HTTP response or a panic (depending on registry config). Later, we definitely want to have a possibility to skip (and only report somehow) non-collectible metrics instead of aborting the whole scrape.
2015-01-12 21:16:09 +03:00
if err := prometheus.Register(taskCounterForWorker2001); err != nil {
fmt.Println("taskCounterVForWorker2001 not registered:", err)
} else {
fmt.Println("taskCounterForWorker2001 registered.")
}
taskCounterForWorker2001.Inc()
taskCounterForWorker42.Inc()
taskCounterForWorker2001.Inc()
// Yet another approach would be to turn the workers themselves into
// Collectors and register them. See the Collector example for details.
// Output:
// taskCounter registered.
// taskCounterVec not registered: a previously registered descriptor with the same fully-qualified name as Desc{fqName: "worker_pool_completed_tasks_total", help: "Total number of tasks completed.", constLabels: {}, variableLabels: [worker_id]} has different label names or a different help string
// taskCounter unregistered.
// taskCounterVec not registered: a previously registered descriptor with the same fully-qualified name as Desc{fqName: "worker_pool_completed_tasks_total", help: "Total number of tasks completed.", constLabels: {}, variableLabels: [worker_id]} has different label names or a different help string
// taskCounterVec registered.
// Worker initialization failed: inconsistent label cardinality
// notMyCounter is nil.
// taskCounterForWorker42 registered.
// taskCounterForWorker2001 registered.
}
func ExampleSummary() {
temps := prometheus.NewSummary(prometheus.SummaryOpts{
Name: "pond_temperature_celsius",
Help: "The temperature of the frog pond.",
Objectives: map[float64]float64{0.5: 0.05, 0.9: 0.01, 0.99: 0.001},
})
// Simulate some observations.
for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
temps.Observe(30 + math.Floor(120*math.Sin(float64(i)*0.1))/10)
}
// Just for demonstration, let's check the state of the summary by
// (ab)using its Write method (which is usually only used by Prometheus
// internally).
metric := &dto.Metric{}
temps.Write(metric)
fmt.Println(proto.MarshalTextString(metric))
// Output:
// summary: <
// sample_count: 1000
// sample_sum: 29969.50000000001
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.5
// value: 31.1
// >
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.9
// value: 41.3
// >
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.99
// value: 41.9
// >
// >
}
func ExampleSummaryVec() {
temps := prometheus.NewSummaryVec(
prometheus.SummaryOpts{
Name: "pond_temperature_celsius",
Help: "The temperature of the frog pond.",
Objectives: map[float64]float64{0.5: 0.05, 0.9: 0.01, 0.99: 0.001},
},
[]string{"species"},
)
// Simulate some observations.
for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
temps.WithLabelValues("litoria-caerulea").Observe(30 + math.Floor(120*math.Sin(float64(i)*0.1))/10)
temps.WithLabelValues("lithobates-catesbeianus").Observe(32 + math.Floor(100*math.Cos(float64(i)*0.11))/10)
}
// Create a Summary without any observations.
temps.WithLabelValues("leiopelma-hochstetteri")
// Just for demonstration, let's check the state of the summary vector
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
// by registering it with a custom registry and then let it collect the
// metrics.
reg := prometheus.NewRegistry()
reg.MustRegister(temps)
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
2016-08-04 16:26:27 +03:00
metricFamilies, err := reg.Gather()
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
if err != nil || len(metricFamilies) != 1 {
panic("unexpected behavior of custom test registry")
}
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
fmt.Println(proto.MarshalTextString(metricFamilies[0]))
// Output:
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
// name: "pond_temperature_celsius"
// help: "The temperature of the frog pond."
// type: SUMMARY
// metric: <
// label: <
// name: "species"
// value: "leiopelma-hochstetteri"
// >
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
// summary: <
// sample_count: 0
// sample_sum: 0
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.5
// value: nan
// >
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.9
// value: nan
// >
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.99
// value: nan
// >
// >
// >
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
// metric: <
// label: <
// name: "species"
// value: "lithobates-catesbeianus"
// >
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
// summary: <
// sample_count: 1000
// sample_sum: 31956.100000000017
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.5
// value: 32.4
// >
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.9
// value: 41.4
// >
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.99
// value: 41.9
// >
// >
// >
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
// metric: <
// label: <
// name: "species"
// value: "litoria-caerulea"
// >
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
// summary: <
// sample_count: 1000
// sample_sum: 29969.50000000001
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.5
// value: 31.1
// >
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.9
// value: 41.3
// >
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.99
// value: 41.9
// >
// >
// >
}
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
func ExampleNewConstSummary() {
desc := prometheus.NewDesc(
"http_request_duration_seconds",
"A summary of the HTTP request durations.",
[]string{"code", "method"},
prometheus.Labels{"owner": "example"},
)
// Create a constant summary from values we got from a 3rd party telemetry system.
s := prometheus.MustNewConstSummary(
desc,
4711, 403.34,
map[float64]float64{0.5: 42.3, 0.9: 323.3},
"200", "get",
)
// Just for demonstration, let's check the state of the summary by
// (ab)using its Write method (which is usually only used by Prometheus
// internally).
metric := &dto.Metric{}
s.Write(metric)
fmt.Println(proto.MarshalTextString(metric))
// Output:
// label: <
// name: "code"
// value: "200"
// >
// label: <
// name: "method"
// value: "get"
// >
// label: <
// name: "owner"
// value: "example"
// >
// summary: <
// sample_count: 4711
// sample_sum: 403.34
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.5
// value: 42.3
// >
// quantile: <
// quantile: 0.9
// value: 323.3
// >
// >
}
func ExampleHistogram() {
temps := prometheus.NewHistogram(prometheus.HistogramOpts{
Name: "pond_temperature_celsius",
Help: "The temperature of the frog pond.", // Sorry, we can't measure how badly it smells.
Buckets: prometheus.LinearBuckets(20, 5, 5), // 5 buckets, each 5 centigrade wide.
})
// Simulate some observations.
for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
temps.Observe(30 + math.Floor(120*math.Sin(float64(i)*0.1))/10)
}
// Just for demonstration, let's check the state of the histogram by
// (ab)using its Write method (which is usually only used by Prometheus
// internally).
metric := &dto.Metric{}
temps.Write(metric)
fmt.Println(proto.MarshalTextString(metric))
// Output:
// histogram: <
// sample_count: 1000
// sample_sum: 29969.50000000001
// bucket: <
// cumulative_count: 192
// upper_bound: 20
// >
// bucket: <
// cumulative_count: 366
// upper_bound: 25
// >
// bucket: <
// cumulative_count: 501
// upper_bound: 30
// >
// bucket: <
// cumulative_count: 638
// upper_bound: 35
// >
// bucket: <
// cumulative_count: 816
// upper_bound: 40
// >
// >
}
Create a public registry interface and separate out HTTP exposition General context and approch =========================== This is the first part of the long awaited wider refurbishment of `client_golang/prometheus/...`. After a lot of struggling, I decided to not go for one breaking big-bang, but cut things into smaller steps after all, mostly to keep the changes manageable and easy to review. I'm aiming for having the invasive breaking changes concentrated in as few steps as possible (ideally one). Some steps will not be breaking at all, but typically there will be breaking changes that only affect quite special cases so that 95+% of users will not be affected. This first step is an example for that, see details below. What's happening in this commit? ================================ This step is about finally creating an exported registry interface. This could not be done by simply export the existing internal implementation because the interface would be _way_ too fat. This commit introduces a qutie lean `Registry` interface (compared to the previous interval implementation). The functions that act on the default registry are retained (with very few exceptions) so that most use cases won't see a change. However, several of those are deprecated now to clean up the namespace in the future. The default registry is kept in the public variable `DefaultRegistry`. This follows the example of the http package in the standard library (cf. `http.DefaultServeMux`, `http.DefaultClient`) with the same implications. (This pattern is somewhat disputed within the Go community but I chose to go with the devil you know instead of creating something more complex or even disallowing any changes to the default registry. The current approach gives everybody the freedom to not touch DefaultRegistry or to do everything with a custom registry to play save.) Another important part in making the registry lean is the extraction of the HTTP exposition, which also allows for customization of the HTTP exposition. Note that the separation of metric collection and exposition has the side effect that managing the MetricFamily and Metric protobuf objects in a free-list or pool isn't really feasible anymore. By now (with better GC in more recent Go versions), the returns were anyway dimisishing. To be effective at all, scrapes had to happen more often than GC cycles, and even then most elements of the protobufs (everything excetp the MetricFamily and Metric structs themselves) would still cause allocation churn. In a future breaking change, the signature of the Write method in the Metric interface will be adjusted accordingly. In this commit, avoiding breakage is more important. The following issues are fixed by this commit (some solved "on the fly" now that I was touching the code anyway and it would have been stupid to port the bugs): https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/46 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/170 https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/205 Documentation including examples have been amended as required. What future changes does this commit enable? ============================================ The following items are not yet implemented, but this commit opens the possibility of implementing these independently. - The separation of the HTTP exposition allows the implementation of other exposition methods based on the Registry interface, as known from other Prometheus client libraries, e.g. sending the metrics to Graphite. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/197 - The public `Registry` interface allows the implementation of convenience tools for testing metrics collection. Those tools can inspect the collected MetricFamily protobufs and compare them to expectation. Also, tests can use their own testing instance of a registry. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/58 Notable non-goals of this commit ================================ Non-goals that will be tackled later ------------------------------------ The following two issues are quite closely connected to the changes in this commit but the line has been drawn deliberately to address them in later steps of the refurbishment: - `InstrumentHandler` has many known problems. The plan is to create a saner way to conveniently intrument HTTP handlers and remove the old `InstrumentHandler` altogether. To keep breakage low for now, even the default handler to expose metrics is still using the old `InstrumentHandler`. This leads to weird naming inconsistencies but I have deemed it better to not break the world right now but do it in the change that provides better ways of instrumenting HTTP handlers. Cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/200 - There is work underway to make the whole handling of metric descriptors (`Desc`) more intuitive and transparent for the user (including an ability for less strict checking, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/47). That's quite invasive from the perspective of the internal code, namely the registry. I deliberately kept those changes out of this commit. - While this commit adds new external dependency, the effort to vendor anything within the library that is not visible in any exported types will have to be done later. Non-goals that _might_ be tackled later --------------------------------------- There is a strong and understandable urge to divide the `prometheus` package into a number of sub-packages (like `registry`, `collectors`, `http`, `metrics`, …). However, to not run into a multitude of circular import chains, this would need to break every single existing usage of the library. (As just one example, if the ubiquitious `prometheus.MustRegister` (with more than 2,000 uses on GitHub alone) is kept in the `prometheus` package, but the other registry concerns go into a new `registry` package, then the `prometheus` package would import the `registry` package (to call the actual register method), while at the same time the `registry` package needs to import the `prometheus` package to access `Collector`, `Metric`, `Desc` and more. If we moved `MustRegister` into the `registry` package, thousands of code lines would have to be fixed (which would be easy if the world was a mono repo, but it is not). If we moved everything else the proposed registry package needs into packages of their own, we would break thousands of other code lines.) The main problem is really the top-level functions like `MustRegister`, `Handler`, …, which effectively pull everything into one package. Those functions are however very convenient for the easy and very frequent use-cases. This problem has to be revisited later. For now, I'm trying to keep the amount of exported names in the package as low as possible (e.g. I unexported expvarCollector in this commit because the NewExpvarCollector constructor is enough to export, and it is now consistent with other collectors, like the goCollector). Non-goals that won't be tackled anytime soon -------------------------------------------- Something that I have played with a lot is "streaming collection", i.e. allow an implementation of the `Registry` interface that collects metrics incrementally and serves them while doing so. As it has turned out, this has many many issues and makes the `Registry` interface very clunky. Eventually, I made the call that it is unlikely we will really implement streaming collection; and making the interface more clunky for something that might not even happen is really a big no-no. Note that the `Registry` interface only creates the in-memory representation of the metric family protobufs in one go. The serializaton onto the wire can still be handled in a streaming fashion (which hasn't been done so far, without causing any trouble, but might be done in the future without breaking any interfaces). What are the breaking changes? ============================== - Signatures of functions pushing to Pushgateway have changed to allow arbitrary grouping (which was planned for a long time anyway, and now that I had to work on the Push code anyway for the registry refurbishment, I finally did it, cf. https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/100). With the gained insight that pushing to the default registry is almost never the right thing, and now that we are breaking the Push call anyway, all the Push functions were moved to their own package, which cleans up the namespace and is more idiomatic (pushing Collectors is now literally done by `push.Collectors(...)`). - The registry is doing more consistency checks by default now. Past creators of inconsistent metrics could have masked the problem by not setting `EnableCollectChecks`. Those inconsistencies will now be detected. (But note that a "best effort" metrics collection is now possible with `HandlerOpts.ErrorHandling = ContinueOnError`.) - `EnableCollectChecks` is gone. The registry is now performing some of those checks anyway (see previous item), and a registry with all of those checks can now be created with `NewPedanticRegistry` (only used for testing). - `PanicOnCollectError` is gone. This behavior can now be configured when creating a custom HTTP handler.
2016-07-20 18:11:14 +03:00
func ExampleNewConstHistogram() {
desc := prometheus.NewDesc(
"http_request_duration_seconds",
"A histogram of the HTTP request durations.",
[]string{"code", "method"},
prometheus.Labels{"owner": "example"},
)
// Create a constant histogram from values we got from a 3rd party telemetry system.
h := prometheus.MustNewConstHistogram(
desc,
4711, 403.34,
map[float64]uint64{25: 121, 50: 2403, 100: 3221, 200: 4233},
"200", "get",
)
// Just for demonstration, let's check the state of the histogram by
// (ab)using its Write method (which is usually only used by Prometheus
// internally).
metric := &dto.Metric{}
h.Write(metric)
fmt.Println(proto.MarshalTextString(metric))
// Output:
// label: <
// name: "code"
// value: "200"
// >
// label: <
// name: "method"
// value: "get"
// >
// label: <
// name: "owner"
// value: "example"
// >
// histogram: <
// sample_count: 4711
// sample_sum: 403.34
// bucket: <
// cumulative_count: 121
// upper_bound: 25
// >
// bucket: <
// cumulative_count: 2403
// upper_bound: 50
// >
// bucket: <
// cumulative_count: 3221
// upper_bound: 100
// >
// bucket: <
// cumulative_count: 4233
// upper_bound: 200
// >
// >
}
func ExampleAlreadyRegisteredError() {
reqCounter := prometheus.NewCounter(prometheus.CounterOpts{
Name: "requests_total",
Help: "The total number of requests served.",
})
if err := prometheus.Register(reqCounter); err != nil {
if are, ok := err.(prometheus.AlreadyRegisteredError); ok {
// A counter for that metric has been registered before.
// Use the old counter from now on.
reqCounter = are.ExistingCollector.(prometheus.Counter)
} else {
// Something else went wrong!
panic(err)
}
}
reqCounter.Inc()
}
func ExampleGatherers() {
reg := prometheus.NewRegistry()
temp := prometheus.NewGaugeVec(
prometheus.GaugeOpts{
Name: "temperature_kelvin",
Help: "Temperature in Kelvin.",
},
[]string{"location"},
)
reg.MustRegister(temp)
temp.WithLabelValues("outside").Set(273.14)
temp.WithLabelValues("inside").Set(298.44)
var parser expfmt.TextParser
text := `
# TYPE humidity_percent gauge
# HELP humidity_percent Humidity in %.
humidity_percent{location="outside"} 45.4
humidity_percent{location="inside"} 33.2
# TYPE temperature_kelvin gauge
# HELP temperature_kelvin Temperature in Kelvin.
temperature_kelvin{location="somewhere else"} 4.5
`
parseText := func() ([]*dto.MetricFamily, error) {
parsed, err := parser.TextToMetricFamilies(strings.NewReader(text))
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
var result []*dto.MetricFamily
for _, mf := range parsed {
result = append(result, mf)
}
return result, nil
}
gatherers := prometheus.Gatherers{
reg,
prometheus.GathererFunc(parseText),
}
gathering, err := gatherers.Gather()
if err != nil {
fmt.Println(err)
}
out := &bytes.Buffer{}
for _, mf := range gathering {
if _, err := expfmt.MetricFamilyToText(out, mf); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
}
fmt.Print(out.String())
fmt.Println("----------")
// Note how the temperature_kelvin metric family has been merged from
// different sources. Now try
text = `
# TYPE humidity_percent gauge
# HELP humidity_percent Humidity in %.
humidity_percent{location="outside"} 45.4
humidity_percent{location="inside"} 33.2
# TYPE temperature_kelvin gauge
# HELP temperature_kelvin Temperature in Kelvin.
# Duplicate metric:
temperature_kelvin{location="outside"} 265.3
# Wrong labels:
temperature_kelvin 4.5
`
gathering, err = gatherers.Gather()
if err != nil {
fmt.Println(err)
}
// Note that still as many metrics as possible are returned:
out.Reset()
for _, mf := range gathering {
if _, err := expfmt.MetricFamilyToText(out, mf); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
}
fmt.Print(out.String())
// Output:
// # HELP humidity_percent Humidity in %.
// # TYPE humidity_percent gauge
// humidity_percent{location="inside"} 33.2
// humidity_percent{location="outside"} 45.4
// # HELP temperature_kelvin Temperature in Kelvin.
// # TYPE temperature_kelvin gauge
// temperature_kelvin{location="inside"} 298.44
// temperature_kelvin{location="outside"} 273.14
// temperature_kelvin{location="somewhere else"} 4.5
// ----------
// 2 error(s) occurred:
// * collected metric temperature_kelvin label:<name:"location" value:"outside" > gauge:<value:265.3 > was collected before with the same name and label values
// * collected metric temperature_kelvin gauge:<value:4.5 > has label dimensions inconsistent with previously collected metrics in the same metric family
// # HELP humidity_percent Humidity in %.
// # TYPE humidity_percent gauge
// humidity_percent{location="inside"} 33.2
// humidity_percent{location="outside"} 45.4
// # HELP temperature_kelvin Temperature in Kelvin.
// # TYPE temperature_kelvin gauge
// temperature_kelvin{location="inside"} 298.44
// temperature_kelvin{location="outside"} 273.14
}