mirror of https://github.com/gorilla/websocket.git
Add buffer commentary
This commit is contained in:
parent
7c8e298727
commit
856ca61301
47
doc.go
47
doc.go
|
@ -151,6 +151,53 @@
|
||||||
// checking. The application is responsible for checking the Origin header
|
// checking. The application is responsible for checking the Origin header
|
||||||
// before calling the Upgrade function.
|
// before calling the Upgrade function.
|
||||||
//
|
//
|
||||||
|
// Buffers
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// Connections buffer network input and output to reduce the number
|
||||||
|
// of system calls when reading or writing messages.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// Write buffers are also used for constructing WebSocket frames. See RFC 6455,
|
||||||
|
// Section 5 for a discussion of message framing. A WebSocket frame header is
|
||||||
|
// written to the network each time a write buffer is flushed to the network.
|
||||||
|
// Decreasing the size of the write buffer can increase the amount of framing
|
||||||
|
// overhead on the connection.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// The buffer sizes in bytes are specified by the ReadBufferSize and
|
||||||
|
// WriteBufferSize fields in the Dialer and Upgrader. The Dialer uses a default
|
||||||
|
// size of 4096 when a buffer size field is set to zero. The Upgrader reuses
|
||||||
|
// buffers created by the HTTP server when a buffer size field is set to zero.
|
||||||
|
// The HTTP server buffers have a size of 4096 at the time of this writing.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// The buffer sizes do not limit the size of a message that can be read or
|
||||||
|
// written by a connection.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// Buffers are held for the lifetime of the connection by default. If the
|
||||||
|
// Dialer or Upgrader WriteBufferPool field is set, then a connection holds the
|
||||||
|
// write buffer only when writing a message.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// Applications should tune the buffer sizes to balance memory use and
|
||||||
|
// performance. Increasing the buffer size uses more memory, but can reduce the
|
||||||
|
// number of system calls to read or write the network. In the case of writing,
|
||||||
|
// increasing the buffer size can reduce the number of frame headers written to
|
||||||
|
// the network.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// Some guidelines for setting buffer parameters are:
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// Limit the buffer sizes to the maximum expected message size. Buffers larger
|
||||||
|
// than the largest message do not provide any benefit.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// Depending on the distribution of message sizes, setting the buffer size to
|
||||||
|
// to a value less than the maximum expected message size can greatly reduce
|
||||||
|
// memory use with a small impact on performance. Here's an example: If 99% of
|
||||||
|
// the messages are smaller than 256 bytes and the maximum message size is 512
|
||||||
|
// bytes, then a buffer size of 256 bytes will result in 1.01 more system calls
|
||||||
|
// than a buffer size of 512 bytes. The memory savings is 50%.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
|
// A write buffer pool is useful when the application has a modest number
|
||||||
|
// writes over a large number of connections. when buffers are pooled, a larger
|
||||||
|
// buffer size has a reduced impact on total memory use and has the benefit of
|
||||||
|
// reducing system calls and frame overhead.
|
||||||
|
//
|
||||||
// Compression EXPERIMENTAL
|
// Compression EXPERIMENTAL
|
||||||
//
|
//
|
||||||
// Per message compression extensions (RFC 7692) are experimentally supported
|
// Per message compression extensions (RFC 7692) are experimentally supported
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue