This commit is contained in:
Josh Baker 2016-07-26 10:25:36 -07:00
commit ae4055527c
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
<a href="https://travis-ci.org/tidwall/buntdb"><img src="https://travis-ci.org/tidwall/buntdb.svg?branch=master" alt="Build Status"></a>
<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/coverage-96%25-green.svg?style=flat" alt="Code Coverage">
<a href="https://godoc.org/github.com/tidwall/buntdb"><img src="https://godoc.org/github.com/tidwall/buntdb?status.svg" alt="GoDoc"></a>
<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/version-0.1.0-green.svg" alt="Version">
<!--<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/version-0.1.0-green.svg" alt="Version">-->
</p>
====
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ speed over data size.
The desire to create BuntDB stems from the need for a new embeddable
database for [Tile38](https://github.com/tidwall/tile38). One that can work
both as a performant [Raft Store](https://github.com/tidwall/raft-boltdb),
both as a performant [Raft Store](https://github.com/tidwall/raft-buntdb),
and a Geospatial database.
Much of the API is inspired by the fantastic [BoltDB](https://github.com/boltdb/bolt),
@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ There's the optional database config setting `Config.SyncPolicy` which can be se
How fast is BuntDB?
Here are some example [benchmarks](https://github.com/tidwall/raft-boltdb#benchmarks) when using BuntDB in a Raft Store implementation.
Here are some example [benchmarks](https://github.com/tidwall/raft-buntdb#raftstore-performance-comparison) when using BuntDB in a Raft Store implementation.
You can also run the standard Go benchmark tool from the project root directory: