🔋Fix some minor mistakes in test cases

This commit is contained in:
Andy Pan 2019-07-27 11:14:01 +08:00
parent 26cbd886a9
commit 94763266ad
1 changed files with 9 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -445,12 +445,12 @@ func TestRestCodeCoverage(t *testing.T) {
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
pprem.Submit(demoFunc)
}
t.Logf("pool with pre-malloc, capacity:%d", pprem.Cap())
t.Logf("pool with pre-malloc, running workers number:%d", pprem.Running())
t.Logf("pool with pre-malloc, free workers number:%d", pprem.Free())
t.Logf("pre-malloc pool, capacity:%d", pprem.Cap())
t.Logf("pre-malloc pool, running workers number:%d", pprem.Running())
t.Logf("pre-malloc pool, free workers number:%d", pprem.Free())
pprem.Tune(TestSize)
pprem.Tune(TestSize / 10)
t.Logf("pool with pre-malloc, after tuning capacity, capacity:%d, running:%d", p0.Cap(), p0.Running())
t.Logf("pre-malloc pool, after tuning capacity, capacity:%d, running:%d", pprem.Cap(), pprem.Running())
p, _ := ants.NewPoolWithFunc(TestSize, demoPoolFunc)
defer p.Invoke(Param)
@ -473,10 +473,11 @@ func TestRestCodeCoverage(t *testing.T) {
ppremWithFunc.Invoke(Param)
}
time.Sleep(ants.DEFAULT_CLEAN_INTERVAL_TIME * time.Second)
t.Logf("pool with func, capacity:%d", ppremWithFunc.Cap())
t.Logf("pool with func, running workers number:%d", ppremWithFunc.Running())
t.Logf("pool with func, free workers number:%d", ppremWithFunc.Free())
t.Logf("pre-malloc pool with func, capacity:%d", ppremWithFunc.Cap())
t.Logf("pre-malloc pool with func, running workers number:%d", ppremWithFunc.Running())
t.Logf("pre-malloc pool with func, free workers number:%d", ppremWithFunc.Free())
ppremWithFunc.Tune(TestSize)
ppremWithFunc.Tune(TestSize / 10)
t.Logf("pool with func, after tuning capacity, capacity:%d, running:%d", p.Cap(), p.Running())
t.Logf("pre-malloc pool with func, after tuning capacity, capacity:%d, running:%d", ppremWithFunc.Cap(),
ppremWithFunc.Running())
}